Skip to main content

Iraqi chaos : who is going to pay ?

As Iraqi forces gradually regain their territory from the jihadists of the ISIS, the question remains open of the future of the Iraqi nation. The danger is still important to fall back into violence between the different religious or ethnic factions of the country.
In 2009, Iraq came out of the civil war, with the Americans as referees. This time, Americans no longer have the hand. The Kurds seek to cover their territory, the Shiite militias have ambitions over the country, former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, maneuvers against the current Prime Minister, Haider al-Abadi.
Iraq actually  lacks a national institution above the factions, capable of disarming militias; What had been achieved, precisely, by Saddam Hussein...
The key to disarmament is economic, to be demobilized men need to find work. In the context of present-day Iraq, it will probably be necessary to wait a long time, until a minimum economic development convinces the militias to abandon their weapons to return to work in a stabilized civil society. Meanwhile, there are no jobs, militias remain the only outlet for men.

Iraq must integrate all these militias, in a state strong enough and legitimate for all the factions, for the good of the country. Prime Minister Al-Abadi is trying to create a multi-ethnic cohesion. Perhaps, national conscription could replace fidelity to a militia by patriotism. Unfortunately, there is no longer in Iraq a respected leader capable of overcoming divisions between Shiites and Sunnis.
There was the Baath Party, they dissolved it. There was Saddam Hussein, they killed him without even a fair trial.  United States are seeking to disengage from the Iraqi trap, the country is going to pay the American wizard-apprentice mistakes for a long time.

A track developed by the analysts of the Brookings Institute seems interesting: by decentralizing power in Iraq, we put a brake on sectarianism. The idea would be to offer a decentralized state, offering local solutions, rather than letting local potentates exploit decentralization to authoritatively assume all powers.
Iraqi parliamentarians are currently relegated to the parties that set them up, as in many other countries. This system of political representation prevents reforms of general interest and punishes those who have done a good job but anger their own party, such as former Finance Minister Hoshyar Zebari.
A solution could be to replace the election of parliamentarians with proportional representation by a vote by locality.

The United States is not inclined to repair their mistakes by continuing to pay to help Iraq recover. The European Union will, of course, be called upon by Washington to assist social reforms, such as unemployment in which it has itself been stuck for decades...
Arab countries, especially the rich Gulf states, are outrageously absent in Iraq. It is true that they were not the direct instigators of American engagement in the Gulf War, apart from their own troubles with Saddam.
Finally, Iran, despite and because of the American opposition, clearly has a major role to play in Iraq. Teheran, an old political empire, knows, unlike the governments of Washington, how to wait its time...

See also William Kergroach conference on

Source: Brookings Institute conference with Tamara Cofman Wittes, Center for Middle East Policy (CMEP), Florence Gaub, European Union Institute for Security Studies; Kenneth Pollack, CMEP, Emma Sky, Yale University.


Popular posts from this blog

South Africa : Will ANC survive to 2019 ?

After twenty-three years of power, in spite of beautiful democrat intentions, the record of the ANC governments in South Africa is mixed: the population is poorer than in the days of apartheid, the state is failing, Corrupted are politicians. Crime has exploded and racial hatred poisons everyday life. South Africa has become an ordinary African country.

The history of South Africa is that of rivalry between three groups: Africans, British origin citizens and Franco-Dutch: the Boers. African population was first enslaved by the army of Her Majesty. Despite the courageous resistance, and a defeat inflicted to the British army by Zulu warriors at the Battle of Isandhlwana (January 22, 1879), African populations were subjected to white power until the end of the twentieth century. Then, the British opposed settlers of Franco-Dutch origin: the Boers.
In 1835, the Boers left the Cape Colony to migrate to the interior of South Africa and escape British domination. It was the "Grand Trek&q…

China is ready to govern the world

"Older countries have glasses to see the future," might have said a Chinese proverb. President Xi Jinping drew inspiration from the legendary Silk Road, which ensured China's prosperity for a millennium, to launch the most ambitious economic development plan in the history of the 21st century: "One Belt One Road "(OBOR). On one side, a terrestrial "belt" which connects the interior of China with Europe, by Central Asia and Turkey; On the other side, a maritime "road" linking the Chinese coastline to the East of Africa, passing through the Arabic Gulf countries. It is the "New Silk Road" which formalizes the entry of China into the club of the great superpowers.

Indeed, OBOR materializes the political and commercial alliances that China, the rising power of the 21st century, has patiently woven for decades. For several years, Chinese companies have been building pipelines and fiber optic networks across Eurasia and Africa. Far from …

France and Australia are ready for a war in the Pacific.

France is a small country ... of 11 million square kilometers, thanks to the 200 thousand Exclusive Economic Zone that surround the smallest of its islets. French Polynesia alone comprises over 100 islands and atolls lost in the Pacific, an area twenty times larger than the United Kingdom. Yet, at the end of the Cold War, Paris was thinking of getting rid of these lost territories in the Pacific. Didn't the Noumea Treaty offer a referendum on the independence of New Caledonia for 2018 ? Today, the deal has changed. Paris has good reasons to keep its territories in the Pacific.

China is investing heavily in the area, offering scholarships in Chinese universities, lending money to finance infrastructure projects throughout the region. The beneficiary countries must accept, in return, Chinese immigrants. In Tonga Islands, over the last decade, the Chinese have taken over more than 80% of the stores.
China has, of course, also invested in French Polynesia, technical stop, for her, to …